Bus Switching Configurations In Air Insulated Substations
(AIS)
Various
factors affect the reliability of a substation, one of which is the
arrangement of the switching devices. Arrangement of the switching
devices will impact maintenance, protection, initial substation
development, and cost.
There are six types of substation bus switching arrangements commonly used in air insulated substations:1. Single bus
2. Double bus, double breaker
3. Main and transfer (inspection) bus
4. Double bus, single breaker
5. Ring bus
6. Breaker and a half
1. Single Bus Configuration
This
arrangement involves one main bus with all circuits connected directly
to the bus. The reliability of this type of an arrangement is very low.
When properly protected by relaying, a single failure
to the main bus or any circuit section between its circuit breaker and
the main bus will cause an outage of the entire system. In addition,
maintenance of devices on this system requires the de-energizing of the
line connected to the device.
Maintenance of the bus would require
the outage of the total system, use of standby generation, or switching
to adjacent station, if available. Since the single bus arrangement is
low in reliability, it is not recommended for heavily loaded substations
or substations having a high availability requirement.
Reliability
of this arrangement can be improved by the addition of a bus tiebreaker
to minimize the effect of a main bus failure.
2. Double Bus, Double Breaker Configuration
This
scheme provides a very high level of reliability by having two separate
breakers available to each circuit. In addition, with two separate
buses, failure of a single bus will not impact either line. Maintenance
of a bus or a circuit breaker in this arrangement can be accomplished
without interrupting either of the circuits.
This arrangement
allows various operating options as additional lines are added to the
arrangement; loading on the system can be shifted by connecting lines to
only one bus. A double bus, double breaker scheme is a high-cost
arrangement, since each line has two breakers and requires a larger area
for the substation to accommodate the additional equipment. This is especially true in a low profile configuration.
The protection scheme is also more involved than a single bus scheme.
3. Main and Transfer Bus Configuration
This
scheme is arranged with all circuits connected between a main
(operating) bus and a transfer bus (also referred to as an inspection
bus). Some arrangements include a bus tie breaker that is connected
between both buses with no circuits connected to it.
Since all
circuits are connected to the single, main bus, reliability of this
system is not very high. However, with the transfer bus available during
maintenance, de-energizing of the circuit can be avoided. Some systems
are operated with the transfer bus normally de-energized. When
maintenance work is necessary, the transfer bus is energized by either
closing the tie breaker, or when a tie breaker is not installed, closing
the switches connected to the transfer bus. With these switches closed,
the breaker to be maintained can be opened along with its isolation
switches. Then the breaker is taken out of service. The circuit breaker
remaining in service will now be connected to both circuits through the
transfer bus.
This way, both circuits remain energized during
maintenance. Since each circuit may have a different circuit
configuration, special relay settings may be used when operating in this
abnormal arrangement.
When a bus tie breaker is present, the bus
tie breaker is the breaker used to replace the breaker being maintained,
and the other breaker is not connected to the transfer bus. A
shortcoming of this scheme is that if the main bus is taken out of
service, even though the circuits can remain energized through the
transfer bus and its associated switches, there would be no relay
protection for the circuits. Depending on the system arrangement, this
concern can be minimized through the use of circuit protection devices
(reclosure or fuses) on the lines outside the substation.
This
arrangement is slightly more expensive than the single bus arrangement,
but does provide more flexibility during maintenance. Protection of this
scheme is similar to that of the single bus arrangement. The area
required for a low profile substation with a main and transfer bus scheme
is also greater than that of the single bus, due to the additional
switches and bus.
4. Double Bus, Single Breaker Configuration
This
scheme has two main buses connected to each line circuit breaker and a
bus tie breaker. Utilizing the bus tie breaker in the closed position
allows the transfer of line circuits from bus to bus by means of the
switches. This arrangement allows the operation of the circuits from
either bus. In this arrangement, a failure on one bus will not affect
the other bus.
However, a bus tie breaker failure will cause the
outage of the entire system. Operating the bus tie breaker in the
normally open position defeats the advantages of the two main buses. It
arranges the system into two single bus systems, which as described
previously, has very low reliability. Relay protection for this scheme
can be complex, depending on the system requirements, flexibility, and
needs.
With two buses and a bus tie available, there is some ease
in doing maintenance, but maintenance on line breakers and switches
would still require outside the substation switching to avoid outages.
5. Ring Bus Configuration
In
this scheme, as indicated by the name, all breakers are arranged in a
ring with circuits tapped between breakers. For a failure on a circuit,
the two adjacent breakers will trip without affecting the rest of the
system. Similarly, a single bus failure will only affect the adjacent
breakers and allow the rest of the system to remain energized. However, a
breaker failure or breakers that fail to trip will require adjacent
breakers to be tripped to isolate the fault.
Maintenance
on a circuit breaker in this scheme can be accomplished without
interrupting any circuit, including the two circuits adjacent to the
breaker being maintained. The breaker to be maintained is taken out of
service by tripping the breaker, then opening its isolation switches.
Since the other breakers adjacent to the breaker being maintained are in
service, they will continue to supply the circuits. In order to gain
the highest reliability with a ring bus scheme, load and source circuits
should be alternated when connecting to the scheme.
Arranging the
scheme in this manner will minimize the potential for the loss of the
supply to the ring bus due to a breaker failure. Relaying is more
complex in this scheme than some previously identified. Since there is
only one bus in this scheme, the area required to develop this scheme is
less than some of the previously discussed schemes. However, expansion
of a ring bus is limited, due to the practical arrangement of circuits.
6. Breaker-and-a-Half Configuration
The
breaker-and-a-half scheme can be developed from a ring bus arrangement
as the number of circuits increases. In this scheme, each circuit is
between two circuit breakers, and there are two main buses. The failure
of a circuit will trip the two adjacent breakers and not interrupt any
other circuit. With the three breaker arrangement for each bay, a center
breaker failure will cause the loss of the two adjacent circuits.
However, a breaker failure of the breaker adjacent to the bus will only
interrupt one circuit.
Maintenance of a breaker on this scheme can
be performed without an outage to any circuit. Further- more, either
bus can be taken out of service with no interruption to the service.
This is one of the most reliable arrangements, and it can continue to be
expanded as required. Relaying is more involved than some schemes
previously discussed.
This scheme will require more area and is costly due to the additional components.
Comparison table of configurations:
| Configuration | Reliability | Cost | Available area |
| .Single bus | Least reliable — single failure can cause complete outage | Least cost — fewer components | Least area — fewer components |
| .Double bus | Highly reliable — duplicated components; single failure normally isolates single component | High cost — duplicated components | Greater area — twice as many components |
| .Main bus and .transfer | Least reliable — same as Single bus, but flexibility in operating and maintenance with transfer bus | Moderate cost — fewer components | Low area requirement — fewer components |
| .Double bus, .single breaker | Moderately reliable — depends on arrangement of components and bus | Moderate cost — more components | Moderate area — more components |
| .Ring bus | High reliability — single failure isolates single component | Moderate cost — more components | Moderate area — increases with number of circuits |
| .Breaker and a.half | Highly reliable — single circuit failure isolates single circuit, bus failures do not affect circuits | Moderate cost — breaker-and-a-half for each circuit | Greater area — more components per circuit |